Quantcast

Detroit City Wire

Friday, September 12, 2025

Resolution urges SCOTUS to reconsider marriage definition in Michigan

Webp yvqnom3qg4qpd7t6z868w4mbm85u

Steve Cortes, CNN Political Commentator (left) & Josh Schriver, Michigan House Representative (right) | Office Holder website

Steve Cortes, CNN Political Commentator (left) & Josh Schriver, Michigan House Representative (right) | Office Holder website

House Resolution 28 has been introduced, urging the Supreme Court to allow Michigan to adhere to the state's Constitution, which defines marriage as a union between one man and one woman. Understanding the implications of this resolution relies heavily on historical and present contexts.

Justice Clarence Thomas had previously warned about judicial overreach following the Obergefell v. Hodges decision, stating that "the majority’s decision is an act of will, not legal judgment. The right it announces has no basis in the Constitution or this Court’s precedent."

The decision's impact is highlighted by cases like Kim Davis, a former Rowan County Clerk in Kentucky, who faced legal consequences for refusing to issue same-sex marriage licenses. Michigan's Christian adoption agencies and businesses have also encountered legal challenges aligning with their religious beliefs.

Opponents of changes to marriage definitions argue that these transformations have led to societal issues, including financial burdens on taxpayers, psychological impacts on children, and increased societal costs. The discussion centers around whether constitutional definitions of marriage provide benefits or contribute to family and societal structures.

The resolution calls to preserve marriage as stated in Michigan’s Constitution, quoting, “To secure and preserve the benefits of marriage for our society and for future generations of children, the union of one man and one woman in marriage shall be the only agreement recognized as a marriage or similar union for any purpose.”

In another development, Governor Whitmer’s State of the State address proposed $3 billion in road funding, raising questions regarding funding specifics and potential tax increases. Criticism arises from the observation that Michigan spent substantial amounts on corporate welfare, suggesting a reallocation of funds instead of increasing taxes.

On legislative updates, recent bills like HB 4052 and HB 4053, which prohibit non-disclosure agreements in legislative capacities, were passed. These bills aim to promote transparency and restore public trust in Michigan’s governance. Representative Josh Schriver supported these measures, emphasizing the importance of accountability to taxpayers.

The Oversight Committee also commenced organizational meetings, prioritizing audits regarding illegal aliens in Michigan, election system vulnerabilities, COVID-19 responses by Governor Whitmer, and alleged abuses of power by Attorney General Nessel.

Schriver invites the public to contribute to the investigative agenda by submitting issues at MIOversight.com, in his effort to keep constituents informed and engaged.

"Thank you for taking the time to read my newsletter," Representative Schriver concludes, reaching out for questions and comments.

ORGANIZATIONS IN THIS STORY

!RECEIVE ALERTS

The next time we write about any of these orgs, we’ll email you a link to the story. You may edit your settings or unsubscribe at any time.
Sign-up

DONATE

Help support the Metric Media Foundation's mission to restore community based news.
Donate

MORE NEWS